设备完整性一页纸Asset Integrity One-Pager · CT-101 · 冷却塔CT-101 · Cooling Tower

类型Type冷却塔Cooling Tower · 生成于Generated 2026-08-08 · 数据源:本地 KB(合成/工程估计)Source: local KB (synthetic / engineering estimate)
诚实声明:本页基于种子本体(prior·标准派生)生成,壁厚/材质/可靠性参数为合成或工程估计值,非装置实测;实测数据灌入后该页将自动转为 posterior(实测更新) 态。PMI/ITPM/RCM 结论不替代现场 PMI 实测与正式 FFS 评估。RCM 派生工单(source=KB.derived_rcm)为规则启发式派单,非已验证 JA1011 RCM 分析。Honesty statement: This page is generated from a seed ontology (prior · standard-derived). Wall-thickness / material / reliability parameters are synthetic or engineering estimates, NOT as-found plant measurements; once measured data is ingested the page automatically switches to the posterior (measured-update) state. PMI/ITPM/RCM conclusions do NOT replace field PMI measurement or formal FFS assessment. RCM-derived work orders (source=KB.derived_rcm) are rule-based heuristic dispatches, not validated JA1011 RCM analyses.
C
关键性等级Criticality Class
3
完整性等级 (1-5)Integrity Level (1-5)
14
失效模式 FM 数Failure Modes (FM)
0
高风险 FM (S≥8 或 O≥8)High-risk FM (S≥8 or O≥8)
6
ITPM 工单数ITPM Work Orders
2027-05
下次全面检验Next Full Inspection
AI 解读(智能洞察)AI Interpretation (Insight)

本设备共 14 个失效模式(FM),其中 0 个为高风险(S≥8 或 O≥8)。 主导风险来自「风机电机故障」(S=6, O=4, AP=中)。 主要失效机理:混凝土碳化 / 钢筋腐蚀, FRP 老化, 填料腐烂。 RCM 维修决策以 CBM 为主(CBM 14 / PM 0 / RTF 0)。 当前无高风险 FM,维持既定 ITPM 周期即可。This equipment has 14 failure modes (FM), of which 0 are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8). The dominant risk is '风机电机故障' (S=6, O=4, AP=中). Main failure mechanisms: 混凝土碳化 / 钢筋腐蚀, FRP 老化, 填料腐烂. RCM maintenance decisions are dominated by CBM (CBM 14 / PM 0 / RTF 0). No high-risk FMs at present; maintain the established ITPM interval.

由结构化 KB 数据合成(compose,非大模型实时推理);所有结论可在下方章节溯源,参数仍为合成/工程估计。Synthesized from structured KB data (compose, not real-time LLM inference); all conclusions traceable in the sections below; parameters remain synthetic / engineering estimates.

1. 设备台账与 RBI(基于风险检验)1. Equipment Registry & RBI (Risk-Based Inspection)

材质Material混凝土框架 + FRP 壳体(非承压结构)
介质Service Fluid循环冷却水(腐蚀/结垢)
设计温度/压力Design T/P40 ℃ / 0.05 MPa
名义壁厚/最小允许Nominal/Min WT400.0 / 350.0 mm
上次检验Last Inspection2025-05
损伤机理Damage Mechanisms混凝土碳化 / 钢筋腐蚀、FRP 老化、填料腐烂
后果类型Consequence TypeOperational
检验有效性Inspection Effectiveness0.8
置信度Confidence0.75
腐蚀速率(估)Corrosion Rate (est.)6.000 mm/yr
壁厚历史趋势(mm)Wall-thickness history trend (mm)
390.0380.0372.0
适用标准Applicable Standards
API 581-2025 API 580 API 571

2. FMEA 风险画像(AIAG-VDA 2019 AP)2. FMEA Risk Profile (AIAG-VDA 2019 AP)

共 14 个 FM,其中Total {len(fms)} FMs, of which 0 个高风险(S≥8 或 O≥8)are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8)
FMFMSSOODDAPAP后果Consequence机理Mechanism证据Evidence
风机电机故障 ▸ 展开▸ expand644Operational0
轴承失效(磨损/剥落) ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational轴承失效(磨损/剥落) (MCS MECH-BEARING-WEAR)1
微生物腐蚀 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational,Environmental微生物腐蚀 (MCS MECH-MIC)1
润滑失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational润滑失效 (MCS MECH-LUBRICATION-FAILURE)1
冷却水腐蚀 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational,Environmental冷却水腐蚀 (MCS MECH-CWC)1
不对中 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational不对中 (MCS MECH-MISALIGNMENT)1
转子不平衡 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational转子不平衡 (MCS MECH-UNBALANCE)1
冲蚀/冲刷腐蚀 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational,Environmental冲蚀/冲刷腐蚀 (MCS MECH-EROSION)1
齿轮磨损/点蚀 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational齿轮磨损/点蚀 (MCS MECH-GEAR-WEAR)1
均匀/局部减薄(通用减薄) ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational均匀/局部减薄(通用减薄) (MCS MECH-THINNING)1
大气腐蚀 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational大气腐蚀 (MCS MECH-ATMOS)1
联轴器失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational联轴器失效 (MCS MECH-COUPLING-FAILURE)1
结构腐蚀/木格腐烂 ▸ 展开▸ expand533Operational0
结垢/堵塞 ▸ 展开▸ expand533Operational结垢/堵塞 (MCS MECH-FOULING)1

3. PMI 材质验证判定(API RP 578)3. PMI Material Verification (API RP 578)

判定:Decision: exempt — 非承压金属/结构件,API RP 578 范围外

4. ITPM 任务库(本设备)4. ITPM Task Library (this equipment)

CBM=2 PM=4
工单号WO ID类型Type描述Description周期(月)Interval (mo)成本cp(元)Cost cp (¥)成本cf(元)Cost cf (¥)预期风险削减Exp. Risk Reduc.成本来源Cost Source
ITPM-CT-101-C02CBM状态监测/点检(风机电机故障)8002100011.0%prior-template
ITPM-CT-101-C01CBM状态监测/点检(结构腐蚀/木格腐烂)1500320003.3%prior-template
ITPM-CT-101-P03PM定期结构检查120prior-template
ITPM-CT-101-P04PM填料更换120prior-template
ITPM-CT-101-P05PM电机振动120prior-template
ITPM-CT-101-P06PM电流监测120prior-template

4.1 处方与成本权衡4.1 Prescription & Cost Trade-off

成本取自 crq 参数(cp=检验成本,cf=失效纠正成本),预期风险削减为不执行该工单的年度失效概率上限近似。当前 crq 未标实测来源,统一标注 prior-template(非装置实测成本);实测数据经 ingest_measured 审批并入后转 posterior,削减值将升级为风险成本率精算(goal_planning._cost_rate_at)。Costs are drawn from crq parameters (cp = inspection cost, cf = failure correction cost); expected risk reduction approximates the upper bound of annual failure probability if the work order is not executed. Current crq has no measured source, uniformly tagged prior-template (not as-found plant cost); once measured data is approved and ingested via ingest_measured it switches to posterior, and the reduction upgrades to a risk-cost-rate actuarial value (goal_planning._cost_rate_at).

5. RCM 维修决策(策略落地)5. RCM Maintenance Decisions (Strategy Landing)

本设备 14/14 个 FM 已落 RCM 维修决策;分布:14/14 FMs have RCM decisions; distribution: CBM 14 工程推导eng. infer

FM 维修决策样例Sample FM RCM decisions
FMFM决策Decision策略Strategy推荐任务Task间隔Interval
结构腐蚀/木格腐烂CBM视情维修(On-Condition)沉降/变形观测 + 支撑/基础评估; 无损检测(UT/VT/MT/PT), 按 API 581 RBI 风险定级设定检验间隔; 泄漏监测 + 密封/填料定期更换, 螺栓热紧固高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
风机电机故障CBM视情维修(On-Condition)绝缘/电气试验 + 继电保护定值校核 + 操动机构特性测试; 温度/红外热成像监测, 超温报警与根因排查; 振动频谱分析 + 动平衡 + 激光对中, 状态监测趋势管理高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
结垢/堵塞CBM视情维修(On-Condition)按压差/效率监测设定清洗周期 + 过滤/防堵维护高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
轴承失效(磨损/剥落)CBM视情维修(On-Condition)振动频谱分析 + 动平衡 + 激光对中, 状态监测趋势管理高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
微生物腐蚀CBM视情维修(On-Condition)无损检测(UT/VT/MT/PT), 按 API 581 RBI 风险定级设定检验间隔高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
润滑失效CBM视情维修(On-Condition)振动频谱分析 + 动平衡 + 激光对中, 状态监测趋势管理高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
冷却水腐蚀CBM视情维修(On-Condition)温度/红外热成像监测, 超温报警与根因排查; 无损检测(UT/VT/MT/PT), 按 API 581 RBI 风险定级设定检验间隔高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
不对中CBM视情维修(On-Condition)振动频谱分析 + 动平衡 + 激光对中, 状态监测趋势管理高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)

ITPM 总工单 6 张,RCM 派生 0 张;KB→工单闭环已建立,供 CMMS/SAP 消费。所有决策均属工程推导(非实测台账),执行前须经设备主管确认。Total 6 ITPM work orders, 0 RCM-derived; KB→work-order closed loop established for CMMS/SAP consumption. All decisions are engineering inference (not measured field data), subject to equipment-owner confirmation before execution.

6. 完整性结论与行动6. Integrity Conclusion & Actions

MIQA 状态MIQA Statusin_service
完整性等级Integrity Level3 / 5
上次全面检验Last Full Inspection2025-05
下次检验到期Next Inspection Due2027-05
MOC 关联MOC LinkMOC-2026-010
建议优先级Recommended Priority

当前无 S≥8/O≥8 高风险 FM,维持既定 ITPM 周期即可。No S≥8/O≥8 high-risk FMs at present; maintain the established ITPM interval.