设备完整性一页纸Asset Integrity One-Pager · DE-101 · 柴油机/内燃机/应急柴油机/柴油发动机DE-101 · Diesel Engine

类型Type柴油机/内燃机/应急柴油机/柴油发动机Diesel Engine · 生成于Generated 2026-08-08 · 数据源:本地 KB(合成/工程估计)Source: local KB (synthetic / engineering estimate)
诚实声明:本页基于种子本体(prior·标准派生)生成,壁厚/材质/可靠性参数为合成或工程估计值,非装置实测;实测数据灌入后该页将自动转为 posterior(实测更新) 态。PMI/ITPM/RCM 结论不替代现场 PMI 实测与正式 FFS 评估。RCM 派生工单(source=KB.derived_rcm)为规则启发式派单,非已验证 JA1011 RCM 分析。Honesty statement: This page is generated from a seed ontology (prior · standard-derived). Wall-thickness / material / reliability parameters are synthetic or engineering estimates, NOT as-found plant measurements; once measured data is ingested the page automatically switches to the posterior (measured-update) state. PMI/ITPM/RCM conclusions do NOT replace field PMI measurement or formal FFS assessment. RCM-derived work orders (source=KB.derived_rcm) are rule-based heuristic dispatches, not validated JA1011 RCM analyses.
推算est.
关键性等级Criticality Class
3 / 5推算est.
完整性等级 (1-5)Integrity Level (1-5)
13
失效模式 FM 数Failure Modes (FM)
2
高风险 FM (S≥8 或 O≥8)High-risk FM (S≥8 or O≥8)
0
ITPM 工单数ITPM Work Orders
待实测待实测TBD
下次全面检验Next Full Inspection
AI 解读(智能洞察)AI Interpretation (Insight)

本设备共 13 个失效模式(FM),其中 2 个为高风险(S≥8 或 O≥8)。 主导风险来自「振动诱发疲劳」(S=8, O=3, AP=低)。 主要失效机理:轴承失效(磨损/剥落) (MCS MECH-BEARING-WEAR), 密封失效 (MCS MECH-SEAL-FAILURE), 安全仪表拒动 (MCS MECH-SIS-FAIL-TO-ACT)。 RCM 维修决策以 CBM 为主(CBM 12 / PM 1 / RTF 0)。 建议优先对高风险 FM 安排 RBI 定点测厚与在线监测复核;含合金部件须执行 PMI 抽检;缺陷按 API 579-1 FFS 闭环。This equipment has 13 failure modes (FM), of which 2 are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8). The dominant risk is '振动诱发疲劳' (S=8, O=3, AP=低). Main failure mechanisms: 轴承失效(磨损/剥落) (MCS MECH-BEARING-WEAR), 密封失效 (MCS MECH-SEAL-FAILURE), 安全仪表拒动 (MCS MECH-SIS-FAIL-TO-ACT). RCM maintenance decisions are dominated by CBM (CBM 12 / PM 1 / RTF 0). Recommendation: prioritize RBI spot thickness measurement and online-monitoring review for high-risk FMs; perform PMI sampling on alloy components; close defects per API 579-1 FFS.

由结构化 KB 数据合成(compose,非大模型实时推理);所有结论可在下方章节溯源,参数仍为合成/工程估计。Synthesized from structured KB data (compose, not real-time LLM inference); all conclusions traceable in the sections below; parameters remain synthetic / engineering estimates.

1. 设备台账与 RBI(基于风险检验)1. Equipment Registry & RBI (Risk-Based Inspection)

材质Material
介质Service Fluid
设计温度/压力Design T/P— ℃ / — MPa
名义壁厚/最小允许Nominal/Min WT— / — mm
上次检验Last Inspection
损伤机理Damage Mechanisms
后果类型Consequence Type
检验有效性Inspection Effectiveness
置信度Confidence
腐蚀速率(估)Corrosion Rate (est.)
壁厚历史趋势(mm)Wall-thickness history trend (mm)
无壁厚历史
适用标准Applicable Standards

2. FMEA 风险画像(AIAG-VDA 2019 AP)2. FMEA Risk Profile (AIAG-VDA 2019 AP)

共 13 个 FM,其中Total {len(fms)} FMs, of which 2 个高风险(S≥8 或 O≥8)are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8)
FMFMSSOODDAPAP后果Consequence机理Mechanism证据Evidence
振动诱发疲劳 ▸ 展开▸ expand833Operational振动诱发疲劳 (MCS MECH-VIB-FATIGUE)1
热疲劳 ▸ 展开▸ expand833Operational热疲劳 (MCS MECH-THERMAL-FATIGUE)1
轴承失效(磨损/剥落) ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational轴承失效(磨损/剥落) (MCS MECH-BEARING-WEAR)1
密封失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational密封失效 (MCS MECH-SEAL-FAILURE)1
安全仪表拒动 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational安全仪表拒动 (MCS MECH-SIS-FAIL-TO-ACT)1
蓄电池容量衰减 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational蓄电池容量衰减 (MCS MECH-BATTERY-AGING)1
润滑失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational润滑失效 (MCS MECH-LUBRICATION-FAILURE)1
不对中 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational不对中 (MCS MECH-MISALIGNMENT)1
转子不平衡 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational转子不平衡 (MCS MECH-UNBALANCE)1
阀门卡涩/内漏 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational阀门卡涩/内漏 (MCS MECH-VALVE-STICKING)1
联轴器失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational联轴器失效 (MCS MECH-COUPLING-FAILURE)1
大气腐蚀 ▸ 展开▸ expand633Operational大气腐蚀 (MCS MECH-ATMOS)1
结垢/堵塞 ▸ 展开▸ expand533Operational结垢/堵塞 (MCS MECH-FOULING)1

3. PMI 材质验证判定(API RP 578)3. PMI Material Verification (API RP 578)

判定:Decision: exempt — 非承压金属/结构件,API RP 578 范围外

4. ITPM 任务库(本设备)4. ITPM Task Library (this equipment)

工单号WO ID类型Type描述Description周期(月)Interval (mo)成本cp(元)Cost cp (¥)成本cf(元)Cost cf (¥)预期风险削减Exp. Risk Reduc.成本来源Cost Source

4.1 处方与成本权衡4.1 Prescription & Cost Trade-off

成本取自 crq 参数(cp=检验成本,cf=失效纠正成本),预期风险削减为不执行该工单的年度失效概率上限近似。当前 crq 未标实测来源,统一标注 prior-template(非装置实测成本);实测数据经 ingest_measured 审批并入后转 posterior,削减值将升级为风险成本率精算(goal_planning._cost_rate_at)。Costs are drawn from crq parameters (cp = inspection cost, cf = failure correction cost); expected risk reduction approximates the upper bound of annual failure probability if the work order is not executed. Current crq has no measured source, uniformly tagged prior-template (not as-found plant cost); once measured data is approved and ingested via ingest_measured it switches to posterior, and the reduction upgrades to a risk-cost-rate actuarial value (goal_planning._cost_rate_at).

5. RCM 维修决策(策略落地)5. RCM Maintenance Decisions (Strategy Landing)

本设备 13/13 个 FM 已落 RCM 维修决策;分布:13/13 FMs have RCM decisions; distribution: CBM 12 PM 1 工程推导eng. infer

高风险 FM 的 RCM 维修决策RCM decisions for high-risk FMs
FMFM决策Decision策略Strategy推荐任务Task间隔Interval
振动诱发疲劳CBM视情维修(On-Condition)无损检测(UT/MT/PT) 监测裂纹萌生, 关键转动件定时拆检; 振动频谱分析 + 动平衡 + 激光对中, 状态监测趋势管理高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
热疲劳CBM视情维修(On-Condition)无损检测(UT/MT/PT) 监测裂纹萌生, 关键转动件定时拆检; 温度/红外热成像监测, 超温报警与根因排查高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)

ITPM 总工单 0 张,RCM 派生 0 张;KB→工单闭环已建立,供 CMMS/SAP 消费。所有决策均属工程推导(非实测台账),执行前须经设备主管确认。Total 0 ITPM work orders, 0 RCM-derived; KB→work-order closed loop established for CMMS/SAP consumption. All decisions are engineering inference (not measured field data), subject to equipment-owner confirmation before execution.

6. 完整性结论与行动6. Integrity Conclusion & Actions

MIQA 状态MIQA Status
完整性等级Integrity LevelNone / 5
上次全面检验Last Full Inspection
下次检验到期Next Inspection Due
MOC 关联MOC Link
建议优先级Recommended Priority

存在 2 个高风险 FM,建议优先安排 RBI 定点测厚与在线监测复核;对含合金部件执行 PMI 抽检。缺陷按 API 579-1 FFS 闭环。There are 2 high-risk FMs; prioritize RBI spot thickness measurement and online-monitoring review; perform PMI sampling on alloy components. Close defects per API 579-1 FFS.