诚实声明：本页基于种子本体（prior·标准派生）生成，壁厚/材质/可靠性参数为合成或工程估计值，非装置实测；实测数据灌入后该页将自动转为 posterior（实测更新） 态。PMI/ITPM/RCM 结论不替代现场 PMI 实测与正式 FFS 评估。RCM 派生工单（source=KB.derived_rcm）为规则启发式派单，非已验证 JA1011 RCM 分析。Honesty statement: This page is generated from a seed ontology (prior · standard-derived). Wall-thickness / material / reliability parameters are synthetic or engineering estimates, NOT as-found plant measurements; once measured data is ingested the page automatically switches to the posterior (measured-update) state. PMI/ITPM/RCM conclusions do NOT replace field PMI measurement or formal FFS assessment. RCM-derived work orders (source=KB.derived_rcm) are rule-based heuristic dispatches, not validated JA1011 RCM analyses.
高推算est.
关键性等级Criticality Class
3 / 5推算est.
完整性等级 (1-5)Integrity Level (1-5)
9
失效模式 FM 数Failure Modes (FM)
2
高风险 FM (S≥8 或 O≥8)High-risk FM (S≥8 or O≥8)
0
ITPM 工单数ITPM Work Orders
待实测待实测TBD
下次全面检验Next Full Inspection
AI 解读（智能洞察）AI Interpretation (Insight)
本设备共 9 个失效模式（FM），其中 2 个为高风险（S≥8 或 O≥8）。 主导风险来自「机械疲劳」（S=8, O=3, AP=低）。 主要失效机理：阀门卡涩/内漏 (MCS MECH-VALVE-STICKING), 冲蚀/冲刷腐蚀 (MCS MECH-EROSION), 结垢/堵塞 (MCS MECH-FOULING)。 RCM 维修决策以 CBM 为主（CBM 8 / PM 0 / RTF 1）。 建议优先对高风险 FM 安排 RBI 定点测厚与在线监测复核；含合金部件须执行 PMI 抽检；缺陷按 API 579-1 FFS 闭环。This equipment has 9 failure modes (FM), of which 2 are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8). The dominant risk is '机械疲劳' (S=8, O=3, AP=低). Main failure mechanisms: 阀门卡涩/内漏 (MCS MECH-VALVE-STICKING), 冲蚀/冲刷腐蚀 (MCS MECH-EROSION), 结垢/堵塞 (MCS MECH-FOULING). RCM maintenance decisions are dominated by CBM (CBM 8 / PM 0 / RTF 1). Recommendation: prioritize RBI spot thickness measurement and online-monitoring review for high-risk FMs; perform PMI sampling on alloy components; close defects per API 579-1 FFS.
由结构化 KB 数据合成（compose，非大模型实时推理）；所有结论可在下方章节溯源，参数仍为合成/工程估计。Synthesized from structured KB data (compose, not real-time LLM inference); all conclusions traceable in the sections below; parameters remain synthetic / engineering estimates.
成本取自 crq 参数（cp=检验成本，cf=失效纠正成本），预期风险削减为不执行该工单的年度失效概率上限近似。当前 crq 未标实测来源，统一标注 prior-template（非装置实测成本）；实测数据经 ingest_measured 审批并入后转 posterior，削减值将升级为风险成本率精算（goal_planning._cost_rate_at）。Costs are drawn from crq parameters (cp = inspection cost, cf = failure correction cost); expected risk reduction approximates the upper bound of annual failure probability if the work order is not executed. Current crq has no measured source, uniformly tagged prior-template (not as-found plant cost); once measured data is approved and ingested via ingest_measured it switches to posterior, and the reduction upgrades to a risk-cost-rate actuarial value (goal_planning._cost_rate_at).
本设备 9/9 个 FM 已落 RCM 维修决策；分布：9/9 FMs have RCM decisions; distribution:CBM 8RTF 1工程推导eng. infer
高风险 FM 的 RCM 维修决策RCM decisions for high-risk FMs
FMFM
决策Decision
策略Strategy
推荐任务Task
间隔Interval
机械疲劳
CBM
视情维修(On-Condition)
无损检测(UT/MT/PT) 监测裂纹萌生, 关键转动件定时拆检
高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
脆性断裂
RTF
设计改进/探测任务(Redesign)
材质复检 + 无损检测 + 设计/材质升级整改(RTF)
高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
ITPM 总工单 0 张，RCM 派生 0 张；KB→工单闭环已建立，供 CMMS/SAP 消费。所有决策均属工程推导（非实测台账），执行前须经设备主管确认。Total 0 ITPM work orders, 0 RCM-derived; KB→work-order closed loop established for CMMS/SAP consumption. All decisions are engineering inference (not measured field data), subject to equipment-owner confirmation before execution.
6. 完整性结论与行动6. Integrity Conclusion & Actions
MIQA 状态MIQA Status
完整性等级Integrity Level
None / 5
上次全面检验Last Full Inspection
下次检验到期Next Inspection Due
MOC 关联MOC Link
建议优先级Recommended Priority
存在 2 个高风险 FM，建议优先安排 RBI 定点测厚与在线监测复核；对含合金部件执行 PMI 抽检。缺陷按 API 579-1 FFS 闭环。There are 2 high-risk FMs; prioritize RBI spot thickness measurement and online-monitoring review; perform PMI sampling on alloy components. Close defects per API 579-1 FFS.