设备完整性一页纸Asset Integrity One-Pager · UPS-101 · 不间断电源（UPS）UPS-101 · Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS)

类型Type：不间断电源（UPS）Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS) · 生成于Generated 2026-08-08 · 数据源：本地 KB（合成/工程估计）Source: local KB (synthetic / engineering estimate)
诚实声明：本页基于种子本体（prior·标准派生）生成，壁厚/材质/可靠性参数为合成或工程估计值，非装置实测；实测数据灌入后该页将自动转为 posterior（实测更新） 态。PMI/ITPM/RCM 结论不替代现场 PMI 实测与正式 FFS 评估。RCM 派生工单（source=KB.derived_rcm）为规则启发式派单，非已验证 JA1011 RCM 分析。Honesty statement: This page is generated from a seed ontology (prior · standard-derived). Wall-thickness / material / reliability parameters are synthetic or engineering estimates, NOT as-found plant measurements; once measured data is ingested the page automatically switches to the posterior (measured-update) state. PMI/ITPM/RCM conclusions do NOT replace field PMI measurement or formal FFS assessment. RCM-derived work orders (source=KB.derived_rcm) are rule-based heuristic dispatches, not validated JA1011 RCM analyses.
高推算est.
关键性等级Criticality Class
3 / 5推算est.
完整性等级 (1-5)Integrity Level (1-5)
12
失效模式 FM 数Failure Modes (FM)
4
高风险 FM (S≥8 或 O≥8)High-risk FM (S≥8 or O≥8)
34
ITPM 工单数ITPM Work Orders
待实测待实测TBD
下次全面检验Next Full Inspection
AI 解读（智能洞察）AI Interpretation (Insight)

本设备共 12 个失效模式（FM），其中 4 个为高风险（S≥8 或 O≥8）。 主导风险来自「逆变器故障」（S=8, O=3, AP=低）。 主要失效机理：硫酸盐化致容量衰减, 热失控链式反应, 功率器件热疲劳。 RCM 维修决策以 PM 为主（CBM 3 / PM 9 / RTF 0）。 建议优先对高风险 FM 安排 RBI 定点测厚与在线监测复核；含合金部件须执行 PMI 抽检；缺陷按 API 579-1 FFS 闭环。This equipment has 12 failure modes (FM), of which 4 are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8). The dominant risk is '逆变器故障' (S=8, O=3, AP=低). Main failure mechanisms: 硫酸盐化致容量衰减, 热失控链式反应, 功率器件热疲劳. RCM maintenance decisions are dominated by PM (CBM 3 / PM 9 / RTF 0). Recommendation: prioritize RBI spot thickness measurement and online-monitoring review for high-risk FMs; perform PMI sampling on alloy components; close defects per API 579-1 FFS.

由结构化 KB 数据合成（compose，非大模型实时推理）；所有结论可在下方章节溯源，参数仍为合成/工程估计。Synthesized from structured KB data (compose, not real-time LLM inference); all conclusions traceable in the sections below; parameters remain synthetic / engineering estimates.

1. 设备台账与 RBI（基于风险检验）1. Equipment Registry & RBI (Risk-Based Inspection)

材质Material
介质Service Fluid
设计温度/压力Design T/P— ℃ / — MPa
名义壁厚/最小允许Nominal/Min WT— / — mm
上次检验Last Inspection
损伤机理Damage Mechanisms
后果类型Consequence Type
检验有效性Inspection Effectiveness
置信度Confidence
腐蚀速率(估)Corrosion Rate (est.)
壁厚历史趋势（mm）Wall-thickness history trend (mm)
无壁厚历史
适用标准Applicable Standards

2. FMEA 风险画像（AIAG-VDA 2019 AP）2. FMEA Risk Profile (AIAG-VDA 2019 AP)

共 12 个 FM，其中Total {len(fms)} FMs, of which 4 个高风险（S≥8 或 O≥8）are high-risk (S≥8 or O≥8)
FMFMSSOODDAPAP后果Consequence机理Mechanism证据Evidence
逆变器故障 ▸ 展开▸ expand834低Operational功率器件热疲劳2
静态开关失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand834低Operational晶闸管失效1
蓄电池后备时间不足 ▸ 展开▸ expand834低Operational整组容量衰减2
蓄电池热失控 ▸ 展开▸ expand824低Safety,Operational热失控链式反应2
蓄电池单体容量衰减 ▸ 展开▸ expand744中Operational硫酸盐化致容量衰减3
输出过载跳闸 ▸ 展开▸ expand743中Operational过载脱扣1
整流器故障 ▸ 展开▸ expand734低Operational整流器件击穿1
控制板/固件故障 ▸ 展开▸ expand734低Operational控制器软硬件故障1
冷却风扇失效 ▸ 展开▸ expand644中Operational轴承磨损/卡滞1
输入浪涌/电压骤降 ▸ 展开▸ expand645中Operational瞬态过电压1
手动/自动旁路故障 ▸ 展开▸ expand735中Operational接触器粘连/拒动1
通信中断 ▸ 展开▸ expand535低Operational监控链路故障1

3. PMI 材质验证判定（API RP 578）3. PMI Material Verification (API RP 578)

判定：Decision: exempt — 非承压金属/结构件，API RP 578 范围外

4. ITPM 任务库（本设备）4. ITPM Task Library (this equipment)

CBM=16 PM=18
工单号WO ID类型Type描述Description周期(月)Interval (mo)成本cp(元)Cost cp (¥)成本cf(元)Cost cf (¥)预期风险削减Exp. Risk Reduc.成本来源Cost Source
ITPM-UPS-101-C12CBM状态监测/点检（通信中断）80003000003.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C02CBM状态监测/点检（蓄电池热失控）80003000002.0%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C06CBM状态监测/点检（控制板/固件故障）80003000003.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-R01CBM基于状态（On-Condition）工单（派生）：蓄电池热失控80003000002.0%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C11CBM状态监测/点检（手动/自动旁路故障）80003000003.0%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C05CBM状态监测/点检（静态开关失效）80003000003.0%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-R03CBM基于状态（On-Condition）工单（派生）：静态开关失效80003000003.0%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C08CBM状态监测/点检（输入浪涌/电压骤降）80003000004.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C09CBM状态监测/点检（输出过载跳闸）80003000004.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C07CBM状态监测/点检（冷却风扇失效）80003000005.8%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C10CBM状态监测/点检（蓄电池后备时间不足）80003000004.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-R04CBM基于状态（On-Condition）工单（派生）：蓄电池后备时间不足80003000004.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C04CBM状态监测/点检（整流器故障）80003000003.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C01CBM状态监测/点检（蓄电池单体容量衰减）80003000007.7%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-C03CBM状态监测/点检（逆变器故障）80003000004.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-R02CBM基于状态（On-Condition）工单（派生）：逆变器故障80003000004.9%prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P13PM蓄电池内阻/容量测试120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P14PM均充维护120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P15PM充电电压整定120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P16PM温度监测120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P17PMIGBT 温度监测120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P18PM模块轮换120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P19PM整流模块巡检120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P20PM静态开关动作测试120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P21PM固件版本管理120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P22PM控制板冗余120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P23PM风扇状态监测120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P24PM备件轮换120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P25PM浪涌保护器检查120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P26PM负载核算120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P27PM容量管理120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P28PM整组放电试验120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P29PM旁路接触器测试120—prior-template
ITPM-UPS-101-P30PM通信冗余120—prior-template

4.1 处方与成本权衡4.1 Prescription & Cost Trade-off

成本取自 crq 参数（cp=检验成本，cf=失效纠正成本），预期风险削减为不执行该工单的年度失效概率上限近似。当前 crq 未标实测来源，统一标注 prior-template（非装置实测成本）；实测数据经 ingest_measured 审批并入后转 posterior，削减值将升级为风险成本率精算（goal_planning._cost_rate_at）。Costs are drawn from crq parameters (cp = inspection cost, cf = failure correction cost); expected risk reduction approximates the upper bound of annual failure probability if the work order is not executed. Current crq has no measured source, uniformly tagged prior-template (not as-found plant cost); once measured data is approved and ingested via ingest_measured it switches to posterior, and the reduction upgrades to a risk-cost-rate actuarial value (goal_planning._cost_rate_at).

5. RCM 维修决策（策略落地）5. RCM Maintenance Decisions (Strategy Landing)

本设备 12/12 个 FM 已落 RCM 维修决策；分布：12/12 FMs have RCM decisions; distribution: PM 9 CBM 3 工程推导eng. infer

高风险 FM 的 RCM 维修决策RCM decisions for high-risk FMs
FMFM决策Decision策略Strategy推荐任务Task间隔Interval
蓄电池热失控PM主动维修(Scheduled)绝缘/电气试验 + 继电保护定值校核 + 操动机构特性测试; 温度/红外热成像监测, 超温报警与根因排查高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
逆变器故障CBM视情维修(On-Condition)无损检测(UT/MT/PT) 监测裂纹萌生, 关键转动件定时拆检; 温度/红外热成像监测, 超温报警与根因排查高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
静态开关失效PM主动维修(Scheduled)绝缘/电气试验 + 继电保护定值校核 + 操动机构特性测试高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)
蓄电池后备时间不足PM主动维修(Scheduled)功能测试/标定/校验, 按厂家与 SIL 要求周期执行高风险 1-3 月 / 中风险 6-12 月 / 低风险 检修期 (按 RBI 风险定级)

ITPM 总工单 34 张，RCM 派生 0 张；KB→工单闭环已建立，供 CMMS/SAP 消费。所有决策均属工程推导（非实测台账），执行前须经设备主管确认。Total 34 ITPM work orders, 0 RCM-derived; KB→work-order closed loop established for CMMS/SAP consumption. All decisions are engineering inference (not measured field data), subject to equipment-owner confirmation before execution.

6. 完整性结论与行动6. Integrity Conclusion & Actions

MIQA 状态MIQA Status
完整性等级Integrity LevelNone / 5
上次全面检验Last Full Inspection
下次检验到期Next Inspection Due
MOC 关联MOC Link
建议优先级Recommended Priority

存在 4 个高风险 FM，建议优先安排 RBI 定点测厚与在线监测复核；对含合金部件执行 PMI 抽检。缺陷按 API 579-1 FFS 闭环。There are 4 high-risk FMs; prioritize RBI spot thickness measurement and online-monitoring review; perform PMI sampling on alloy components. Close defects per API 579-1 FFS.