Accident Lesson Card · Real investigation (tap external link for official report)
← Back to KB navigation
HSE Report No. HSE-PASADENA-1989 1989 Fire Fire Explosion Explosion
Phillips 66 Pasadena 聚乙烯装置反应器沉降腿维修隔离失效导致蒸气云爆炸 VCE(1989,23 死)
Phillips 66 Chemical Complex, Pasadena, Texas, USA (HSE Sragtech Case)
Related equipment → Reactor (reactor)Related equipment → Control valve (control_valve)Related equipment → piping (piping)
23Fatalities
200Injuries
ExplosionMechanism code FTC
Failure Mode · ISO 14224 Mapping
Damage mechanism (recorded in KB)
ExplosionFTC
Internal damage-mechanism code (not ISO 14224)
ISO 14224:2016 functional failure code
OTH · Other
Mapped to ISO OTH — Other.
1What Happened

六台反应器沉降腿清理作业时单隔离球阀实际处于开启状态(气动软管接反,使本应关闭的阀门反而开启),聚乙烯粉料泄漏形成可燃蒸气云,延迟约 2 分钟点火→蒸气云爆炸(VCE),23 死、130–300 伤

2Root Cause

采用单球阀隔离而非双隔断+盲板;阀门气动软管接反导致本应关闭的阀门实际开启;未断开阀空气软管;无气体检测;未执行 PTW;控制室受损通信中断

3Reliability Lessons (from investigation root cause)
  • 采用单球阀隔离而非双隔断
  • 盲板;阀门气动软管接反导致本应关闭的阀门实际开启;未断开阀空气软管;无气体检测;未执行 PTW;控制室受损通信中断
4Associated Failure Mechanisms (Keywords)
隔离阀 球阀 误开 氮气置换 动火 蒸气云 VCE 聚乙烯 沉降腿 维修隔离 可燃气体检测
About the Failure-Mode Code (click to expand)

The mechanism code FTC shown on this card is the KB's internal damage-mechanism abbreviation (not an ISO 14224 code); it describes how the equipment failed. The 'ISO 14224 Mapping' block above maps it to the correct ISO functional failure code (which describes what the equipment failed to do) — these are two distinct dimensions in ISO 14224. The mechanism follows the narrative in the card body.

5Evidence Source (transparent)
Authority:Health and Safety Executive (HSE), UK — Sragtech Case Study
Official Report:www.hse.gov.uk ↗
Data Verification:verified_url_hse_2026-08-07
Related Failure Modes · Traceability

This accident is not yet linked to a specific FM traceability card.

Report No. HSE-PASADENA-1989 · Data from HSE public investigation conclusions, compiled by Reliability AI, for reliability demonstration purposes only. This case is derived from public incident investigation reports for learning purposes only. AIM does not endorse or guarantee its accuracy.