← Back to KB navigation
Equipment FWP-101
FM fwp_discharge_valve_fail
ISO 14224 mode M M
Source engineering_estimate
出口阀/蝶阀失效
FWP-101 · Fire Water Pump
Related equipment → FWP-101
0.82Source conf.
—Evidence conf.
MISO 14224 mode
1Failure Mechanism
Function:控制出水
Failure cause:出口阀卡涩/内漏致出水不足
Damage mechanism：出口阀失效致出水不足
2Source Basis (where this FM comes from)
engineering_estimate
Source confidence 0.82: this FM is derived from the ontology KB and cross-validated by engineering_estimate.
3Evidence Chain (supporting basis)
This FM has no offline curated evidence text; it is derived from the ontology KB and cross-validated by the listed standard clauses and related accident investigations.
Governing standards (evidence)：std:NFPA 20 — Standard for the Installation of Stationary Pumps for Fire Protection · 机理级工程估计，非实测；引用 governing standard 作为分类出处
4Related Real Accidents (traceable to accident cards)
This FM is recorded in 3 real accident investigation(s); tap the report no. to open the corresponding accident lesson card.
5Applicable Standards & Clauses
NFPA 20
No separate clause reference.
6Derived Analysis (seeded from this FM)
7/3/5FMEA Sev/Occ/Det
0.04RBI λ
0.95Monitor pdet
6 月Insp. int.
Current tasks:阀门行程测试
RCFA incident:出口阀/蝶阀失效：出口阀卡涩/内漏致出水不足，后果类型 Operational/Safety，严重度 7
7RCM Maintenance Decision (strategy landing)
PMScheduled (Proactive) Maintenance
Recommended task标定/零点-跨度校验 + SIL Proof test + 阀门行程试验 + 变更管理
Suggested intervalHigh risk 1-3 mo / Medium 6-12 mo / Low risk at turnaround (by API 581 RBI risk ranking)
Decision basis机理类别=instrument
Governing standardsGB/T 21109IEC 61511ISA 84
⚠ This decision is engineering-inferred by RCM logic from the damage mechanism / root cause / failure cause — it is not derived from measured site history. Confirm with the equipment owner and process before execution.
⚠ 本卡技术正文（功能 / 致因 / 损伤机理 / RCFA 叙事）保留中文原文——依可信 AI 红线，自由技术文本不自动机翻、不编造英文译文。UI、设备类型、FM 名、ISO 码、标准号均为英文。